Making Money Scam

There are two major economies today in the world which are growing at a fast rate — India & China. In fact, both are being watched closely, and analysts predict that they will be the future economic super powers. There are varying reports as to who is outpacing the other.

Sadly though, there has been a negative side of this development as well: corruption and scandals are increasing alarmingly. And the magnitude of loot involved, as well as the large number of cases which are surfacing, makes one wonder what cost will society have to bear if unbridled corruption wreaks disaster on the development phenomenon. For, though scandals have been exposed and investigations are ordered, there has never been a single case of public money having been recovered. It is you and I who have to make good this loss to state exchequer by paying additional taxes.

In the eighties, there was the Bofors scandal. Rhetoric & politics aside, nothing tangible has happened to this date. Then there were stock market scandals, fodder scam and several others. But, what is being witnessed in the last few months in India is unprecedented.  First, there was this Commonwealth Games scam (Rs. 15000 million or US $326 million), {Rs. 1300 Crore deficit for Commonwealth Games, taxpayers will Pay} followed by the biggest ever 2G Spectrum Scam [] {What is 2G Spectrum?} (Rs. 1700000 million or US $ 38260 million). The list of recent spate of scams is long.

The deadliest cancer society is afflicted with today is corruption. If you it look up on Wikipedia, it describes the adjective form corrupt as ‘utterly broken’. That precisely describes the state of society as a result of this rotten practice by human beings the world over.

The disregard for spiritual or moral conduct for material pursuits leads to a depraved mental state in which the individual chases illicit wealth or other objects of desire.

This is an attempt to reflect on the many dimensions of this pervasive hydra-headed monster. At the extreme inner core of this evil practice is the perverse desire of the individual for self-gratification borne out of extreme greed. The frustrating thought that it has not been controlled, let alone eradicated, even though it is projected to be unlawful and damaging to society, makes me sick.

Continued on the next page

American leadership is reliable in one respect: it consistently undershoots my already low expectations.

Or maybe I have it backwards because I keep forgetting who the authorities are really serving, and it clearly isn’t you and me. As we will discuss below, the latest scam is that the banking regulators are finalizing a mortgage “breakdown” settlement, and they’ve evidently decided to let the industry off the hook for a mere $20 billion.

In Saudi Arabia, the royal family has just offered $36 billion worth of concessions in an effort to placate an increasingly unruly public (this appears to be in addition to pledges to spend $400 billion on education, health care, and infrastructure by 2014). This is in a country with a population just under 26 million, including over 5 million non-nationals who presumably aren’t eligible.

Now you can easily pooh pooh this comparison, since Saudi Arabia is an autocratic country desperately throwing around money to buy off dissidents, right? But this is the kind of money a leadership group will shell out when pressed to defend an existing order. And the US was very quick to hand out funds right, left, and center during the financial crisis. It’s continuing to do so now in less obvious ways, by continued life support for the mortgage market through Fannie and Freddie, the Fed’s super low interest rates and QE2, and non-monetary measures, most important its refusal to make any sort of serious investigation into what happened in the crisis and prosecute key actors.

Most observers, yours truly included, had expected very little from the multi-regulator “foreclosure task force” announced last year. It was clearly designed to be an even more cosmetic exercise than the stress test charade, which does take a certain amount of brazenness (or more likely, confidence in the public’s inability to follow the three card monte). But a bad situation devolved; the Treasury had appeared to be in charge, and that department at least tries to put a minimum level of professional spit and polish into its charades. When OCC acting chair and chief bank enabler John Walsh got up to speak in an official capacity about the process in last week’s Senate Banking Committee hearings, it was evident there was not even going to be an effort to pretend that this was a serious undertaking.

Even so, the mortgage “settlement” trial balloon floated in the Wall Street Journal this evening is an offense to common sense and decency. Notice how the word “fraud” is pretty much verboten in the MSM; the latest code word for what went awry is “breakdown”. This implies a benign sort of neglect, simply of not doing sufficient maintenance which led fussy machinery to quit working. It is mean to avoid contemplating, let along uncovering, Pinto-type decisions of weighing the costs of making the vehicle safer versus the litigation losses resulting from incineration by exploding gas tanks.

The magic number across the industry is a mere $20 billion in civil fines or payments to fund loan mods. We know from BP not to have a great deal of confidence in settlement funds. It is not yet clear what scope of activities get a free pass (fraudulent servicer charges and impermissible compounding fees? failure to convey notes to mortgage trusts as stipulated in the PSA? foreclosing on home where HAMP mods had been promised?) but the industry will want any waiver to be as broad as possible. But in any kind of settlement of fraud, like securities fraud charges, various responsible parties are also barred from working in the industry, sometimes for life. None of that is on the table.

The plan involves having servicers give borrowers principal mods, but obviously only to the extent of the fund amount. The WSJ story announces that mortgage investors will suffer no losses. This shows how backwards the logic here is. Investors would LOVE principal mods to qualified borrowers; it’s far better than taking 70%+ losses on foreclosures. So saving RMBS investors any pain should never have been a feature of the plan design. And that means it is really a fig leaf for avoiding writedowns on second liens, which are heavily concentrated in the four biggest TBTF banks.

The officialdom is taking the stance that only a small number of borrowers suffered wrongful foreclosures. The HAMP fiasco alone makes that patently untrue. And the regulators’ failure to compare servicer records with borrower records (the short time frame of the task force effort guarantees that did not take place) makes this a garbage in, garbage out exercise. And that’s before you get to the question of fraudulent servicer charges, which foreclosure defense lawyers say represent 50% to 70% of the cases they handle (it’s easier to win based on standing so court records do not reflect the borrower reason for choosing to fight the foreclosure). Without an audit of servicer software, this regulatory assessment was a simple “see no evil” exercise.

Nor do I see any mention of imposing new servicing standards on banks, another massive oversight.

The servicers, as well as Fannie and Freddie, would be required to provide principal mods. But given the meager settlement amount, this is a complete and utter joke. The mods will be too shallow and too few in number to help either borrowers or the housing market. Both J.C. Flowers and Wilbur Ross, both very tough minded investors, have found deep principal mods work, and research supports their views. Why are borrowers going to struggle to make home payments when they still face a loss and/or a big tax bill when they try to sell the home?

If you assume a combined first and second mortgage balance of $200,000 and a mod of 10%, or $20,000, which is too low to make much difference to borrowers and well short of what investors would accept (given 70%+ expected losses on a foreclosure, 25% to even 50% is a no brainer), you get 1,000,000 mods. That sounds peachy until you realize that nearly 30% of the homes in the US, a total of 15.7 million, are underwater and prices are projected to fall further this year. And most are underwater by more than 10%. So even if this works as advertised, who gets help is likely to be capricious and the amount of help will be insufficient.

And as Marcy Wheeler correctly points out, this program is really HAMP 2.0. When a small group of bloggers visited the Treasury last August, HAMP was such an obvious failure that the staff didn’t even try hard to defend it. One of the excuses offered by Geither was that Treasury lacked authority over servicers (a point I disputed, since Treasury has plenty of leverage at its disposal). So there isn’t even any reason to believe the banks (ex perhaps the Fannie and Freddie loans) will live up to their commitment do a paltry number of mods. As Marcy noted:

…basically, it sounds like HAMP II–a “plan” that still lets banks decide how to implement that “plan”–with the sole improvement on HAMP I that it requires 2nd Liens to be “reduced” (but not eliminated) in the process of modifying the first liens.

The deal wouldn’t create any new government programs to reduce principal. Instead, it would allow banks to devise their own modifications or use existing government programs, people familiar with the matter said. Banks would also have to reduce second-lien mortgages when first mortgages are modified.

The good new is it does not sound like there is a deal agreed. The powers that be have yet to corral the state AGs (since when were they going to be part of this scheme?) and the servicers themselves.

So readers can help create heat on the officialdom. It would be very useful to come up with estimates of various types of damages (and it needs to be bottoms up, not “the global financial crisis cost X trillion and at least 25% is the fault of these clowns). First would be a list of types of damage done, and it should be mutually exclusive, and ideally collectively exhaustive. Next are any factoids that would help dimension the level of overall damage per category. For instance, some readers yesterday started using the Massachusetts lost recording fee estimate to try to ballpark the recording fees lost to MERS on a national basis.

Having the level of damages (which would certainly wipe out the banks, but we want everyone reminded of that fact, that any “settlement” is yet another gimmie) then serves as a basis for talking about monetary settlements and other required behavioral changes. The adverse reaction to the Center for American Progress’ Fannie and Freddie “reform” trial ballon apparently did put the powers that be on the back foot; reader information gathering and ideas here would be of great value in putting forward an even more forceful rebuttal to this disgraceful proposal.

BenchCraft, LLC announced that it's going to debut its Concert Series, a whole new line of recliners with an integrated sound method, at Great Stage Market on October 17-22, 2009. Concert Sequence recliners element two built-in stereo speakers along with a subwoofer constructed specially to create a full array of sound. It's got tactile motors that may either vibrate along with the sound or be employed independently being a massage program, and separate controls that make it possible for for individual changes to get developed towards the volume, bass/treble, and therefore the tactile/massage element. The system, that will possess a commencing price tag point of $699, will also include things like a mini audio jack so users can connect to their many different audio sources (i.e. iPods, MP3 players, cell phones, and many others.). To that finish, Sinning mentioned that Berkline will even be introducing in pick motion
bench craft company reviews
furnishings its new eCoupled technological know-how option--a wireless charging station for electronic products which include cell phones, MP3 players, and laptops. Developed by Fulton Innovation, it eliminates the want for energy cords by developing an electromagnetic conduit combined with an intelligent manage method that continuously monitors electrical power movement so a variety of devices from totally different manufactures can charge at the same time. eCoupled technology can be secure for electronic gadgets because it can provide only the amount of energy
bench craft company reviews
desired to maintain a system at peak energy levels, so there is certainly no danger of overcharging. Even while the amount of devices compatible with this technological innovation is restricted, Berkline expects that much more and much more brand names will move toward incorporating the capability to connect towards the eCoupled operate

The Bench Craft Company gives no excuses for the very difficult operate and perseverance that they commit on their own to in order to manage on their own since the leader in nationwide onsite golf program house
bench craft company reviews
advertising. No excuses for giving their customers along with the most complete coverage for his or her bench craft company reviews advertising dollar no matter if it be locally or nationwide. No excuses for offering golf program properties by far the most seamless program for generating added earnings within the most non-intrusive manner, whilst enhancing the high-quality in the amenities and also the practical experience of their golfers on their house. Bench Craft is committed to becoming the most beneficial as well as the largest at what they do, promoting on golf program bench craft company reviews venues.
In an age in which no one
bench craft company reviews
desires to consider duty for anything, Bench Craft can make alone absolutely accountable for the achievement of their marketing purchasers, that's why their consumers and effectively as Bench Craft continuously knowledge nutritious growth prices and revenue margins. A organisation are not able to be any more
bench craft company reviews
victorious than their client, so it is purpose of Bench Craft to make sure that each individual client gets the most effective possible venue for presenting their clientele
bench craft company reviews
services and providers, no matter whether it be locally or nationally. This commitment to excellent is what sets Bench Craft apart from its rivals, and dollar for dollar makes its promoting products a lot of the most helpful within the community.
The golf programs bench craft company reviews that Bench Craft Company will work in concert with, receive companies and products and solutions at no cost. Bench Craft Company sales crew right funds this program for every golf program by acquiring sponsors for each products. Community vendors and players inside neighborhood acquire sponsorship priority and golf course management will work closely with Bench Craft to realize likely sponsors. Bench Craft’s extremely effective
bench craft company reviews
program supplies golf programs a cost-free of cost alternative that also eliminates prices consequently of design and style changes, program modifications, theft and vandalism.
As getting a definite added advantage, every course is secured underneath a $3,000,000 liability policy. The organization can accommodate essentially every single golf course. At the same time, Bench Craft Company functions with each other with all branches for the Armed Forces, plus state, county and metropolis golf courses. This range of golf programs will provide Bench Craft’s buyers along with the most detailed coverage of golf course properties from the United states.
The forward
bench craft company reviews
considering Visionaries at Bench Craft Company created a method that garners the interest and participation of not only its personal sales employees, however the sponsors, golf program management and therefore the membership and patrons. There’s just one Bench Craft Company, don’t fall for rip off plots by imposters working a scam.
bench craft company reviews